Sometimes the topic for my blog posts just scream at me  and to day the theme of feedback has hit me a few times from different directions I realised that I had to add my tuppence worth.

1 It started with a  post over at The Career Encouragement   blog  about conflicting feedback. I won’t repeat any of it here - Peggy’s post is great and says it all ( in my opinion - more of which later). What I will say though is - bear in mind where the feedback is coming from. The person giving the feedback may be working from their own agenda

2 Then  Dave McQueen  on Twitter this morning said

“just looking at some feedback from training. why is it that we remember the one negative point so succintly?”

Do you do this? No matter how great overall the feedback has been - and how many of your skills/talents/strengths have been highlighted your mind plays over and over on the one negative?

3 Dave added later that he was reading written feedback after the event - and he would have liked to have asked for more information. As I get more into training that is one of my biggest frustrations - trying to capture what the written feedback really means. At my training sessions I ask for feedback from the audience before we finish - after all I have been training in speaking up all day. Thankfully - so far - on every occasion the feedback has been overwhelmingly positive. And lest you think I just ask for superficial comments a core part of the training is giving and receiving verbal feedback - I ask for what was good, what could have been better and for suggestions for the next time. However, sometimes the feedback sheets show a low score on one aspect - and I no longer have the chance to find out why that was.

4 At my Speakers Club the format for giving feedback on speeches is that one person is nominated to give verbal feedback in front of the group ( and there is the chance for a one to one session over the break later) and the others in the group have a couple of minutes to write down their own. In my view the best givers of feedback are those who start with - “this is what I noticed”, or “in my view and others might take a different stand” because I believe that all feedback is biased. It has to be based on the experience, or knowledge, or context  of the feedback giver. It might even include how they feel on the night! As I pointed out in #1 - this it is my view that Peggy’s post is good. It is up to you to make your own minds up about whether you agree with me or not.

So why is it so hard to get feedback right?

- The intention of the feedback is important. Was it asked for or offered. That starts from 2 different places

- The context  matters. A superior giving feedback to a junior may influence their future decisions and it is important that thy recognise the impact of that. Peer feedback can be challenging. What expertise does the feedback giver have that qualifies them to give it?

- The  model of feedback needs to be clearly understood . The only time I was in a 360 degree feedback system it was entirely anonymous unless the feedback giver identified themselves. I realised that was to encourage openness but I found the inablity to discuss the feedback further was hugely frustrating.

- The feedback giver’s personal agenda makes a difference.  Are they really giving you feedback to help you improve?

Please share your own experiences -especially if you  - or someone you know - give great feedback.